Category: Theology

Reading Slowly in a Hasty Age

“When I get a little money, I buy books, and if I have any left over I buy food and clothes.” I have always resonated with this statement from 16th century Dutch scholar Desiderius Erasmus. I love books. Reading is one of the most valuable disciplines and joys in life. It is vital to feeding and clothing the mind and soul.

While I enjoy purchasing new books, I must also admit that I have many books on my shelves that I have not read—more books than I’ll be able to get through in the next several years. Many are for reference, some are beneficial for a quick read-through, and others need deeper thought and reflection. Add to this the hundreds of books I have digitally on Kindle or Bible software, and I have a wealth of books to feast on for many years to come.

With so many books to read and so little time, those of us who love to read can be sucked into valuing reading speed and reading quantity over reading quality. The goal can become to read a certain number of books a year, when it should be enjoying good books and being formed by the best books.

We can go so fast and pound our way through book after book, when we should be slowing down, reflecting, and chewing on what we’re reading. Especially as we read for learning and spiritual growth, we often need to slow down and read less, not necessarily more. We need to take time in our Bible reading to meditate on the text more than to meet a goal of reading the Bible in a year (as valuable as that is).

Thomas Brooks, a pastor in the 17th century, put it well:

“Remember, it is not hasty reading, but serious meditating upon holy and heavenly truths, that make them prove sweet and profitable to the soul. It is not the bees touching of the flower that gathers honey, but her abiding for a time upon the flower that draws out the sweet. It is not he that reads most, but he that meditates most, that will prove the choicest, sweetest, wisest and strongest Christian.”

If hasty reading was a problem for the Puritans, it is more so today, especially in our digital context. Our digital age conditions us for passive consumption more than active learning. It forms us to prize quick skimming and synthesis over deep thinking and serious meditation. The increasing ubiquity of AI may lead some to think that sitting down and reading a book for information and learning is an antiquated pursuit. We live in an age of speed and efficiency, where slowing down can seem impossible. But slow down we must, if we want to be formed through reading and not just gulp down books.

One way to slow down is to read physical copies of books and read minimally from a device. Purchase the print version before the digital version. For your Bible intake, grab a printed copy of Scripture instead of pulling out your phone. I own and use (and enjoy) reading on a Kindle, but for serious meditation and deep reading, holding a print copy usually forces me to slow down. I remember more of what I read. I can get a better sense of the whole book with a print copy and review it more thoroughly.

Reading a print copy also allows for better note-taking in the book itself. Digital note-taking is doable and some may prefer it. There are benefits to reading a digital copy and saving highlights easily. But once again, faster and easier are not necessarily always better for long term learning and growth. Physically underlining a sentence or writing a short note requires you to slow down and be more intentional instead of highlighting every interesting passage. It makes you pause, reflect, and think, not just consume passively.

There are certainly many times we should read quickly. If you skimmed this article, I don’t blame you. You still probably got the gist and maybe received some food for thought. At other times, we might read too slowly and too sleepily or sporadically that we gain little from it. Or we may read inferior books too slowly and miss out on better books. But when we read good books for growth, we all could benefit from slowing down a little. Especially when we read the Book God has given us, his perfect and inerrant Word, we must prize serious mediation over hasty reading.

To sum it up in the words of Mortimer J. Adler, “In the case of good books, the point is not to see how many of them you can get through, but rather how many can get through you—how many you can make your own. A few friends are better than a thousand acquaintances.”

Online Corinthians

Read the letters of 1-2 Corinthians, and you’ll quickly see that the Corinthians had problems. Lots of them. There were divisions in the church. They were letting gross sin slide. They were leaving their poorer brothers and sisters in Christ out of the Lord’s Supper. They forgot that the way of disciples of Jesus is the way of the cross.

One of these issues in the Corinthian church had to do with divisions in the church surrounding different leaders. Factions arose that claimed certain leaders, including Apollos, Peter, and Paul himself, as their figureheads (1 Cor 1:12). A related issue was the Corinthian’s attitude toward Paul and his ministry. The Corinthians apparently didn’t think Paul’s oratory skills were up to par and saw his suffering as discrediting his ministry.

The Corinthians formed tribes around their preferred leaders. They looked for power in personality and worldly show instead of the gospel. They didn’t expect their leaders to be clay jars, ordinary and prone to suffering and brokenness.

Sound familiar? These issues are not unique to the church in Corinth in the AD 50s. In fact, perhaps the internet and social media have only acted as gasoline added to the blaze in our day. In a real sense, you could say that we all tend to be Corinthians online.

We form tribes around our preferred leaders. With the advent of the internet, social media, YouTube, podcasts, etc., we can easily devote ourselves to a leader who fits our preferred style. We come not only to be shaped by their teaching, but to defend their honor online, ignore any weaknesses, and bash other leaders who don’t match our vision of what a real Christian leader, pastor, or author should look like.

We look for power in personality and worldly show instead of the gospel. The online world prizes personality and a certain kind of show. What gets the most attention online is often what is most entertaining, loud, or extreme. And what gets the most attention holds more power. We tend to look for power in personality, charisma, show, and clips that can go viral instead of the gospel.

We forget that we and our leaders and influencers are ordinary clay pots. Our leaders are ordinary people too. They’re broken, just like us. They go through hardship just like us. Yet, we can unduly exalt them (they could never be wrong!) or cancel them for disagreeing with us (how could they be so wrong!). Celebrity culture and cancel culture prevail online, and we forget that while godly leaders are a gift from God, they too are jars of clay, men of dust. The power is in the ministry of the gospel, not in any man or woman.

We need the lessons Paul taught the Corinthian church. Our pastors and leaders, if faithful, are servants of Christ. They are servants of Christ who proclaim not themselves, but Christ Jesus as Lord (2 Cor 4:5). The source of power in any ministry is the gospel. God certainly gifts some leaders more than others. But at the end of the day, even the most gifted preachers and leaders cannot truly convert one soul to Christ on their own.

Even the most gifted preachers, even the most creative Christian content creators online, even the most persuasive communicators are clay jars. What matters is what is inside their ministry. What truly has power to transform lives is the word of the cross, the gospel.

Is Technology an Intruder in God’s World?

Technology intrudes on my life. It keeps me from being present. Compared to nature, it can feel impure and imposing. Technology invades my home and takes over my walls, my pocket, my wrist. Technology can feel like an intruder in the pure world God created. We’ve probably all felt this way. Technology can feel like something outside the pure world of nature invading and taking over the earth like a bunch of Daleks from Dr. Who.

Our smartphones, smart TVs, smartwatches, and smart-everything-elses can genuinely feel like intruders, but we need to step back and ask: where do they really come from? Tech critic Neil Postman articulated one view that we may resonate with at times:

“The best way to view technology is as a strange intruder, to remember that technology is not part of God’s plan but a product of human creativity and hubris.”

Technology, in this view, is man’s invention that we impose upon God’s pure creation. Postman goes on to argue that technology gives the impression that it is inevitable and has always been there. Technologies and inventions like the alphabet, books, and smartphones can come to a place where we see them as “gifts of nature, not as artifacts produced in a specific political and historical context.” In other words, technology becomes “mythic”.

Postman definitely makes an important point. Technologies are human inventions, and often behind them is the pride of man. No technology is merely neutral. All are formed in a context with certain priorities and tend to shape us in certain ways. However, can we say that technology isn’t part of God’s plan? Is technology merely a product of human pride? These questions get at this important issue: where does technology come from?

I think we must reject from the outset Postman’s statement that technology is not part of God’s plan. Such a statement betrays a kind of deism, not a biblical understanding God’s relation to the world. God did not create the world, hand the keys to humanity, and step out of the picture. The unified testimony of Scripture is clear: God in his providence remains involved in the world. Not even a bird can die apart from his will, and he knows and cares about the most mundane details of our lives (Matt 10:29-30). All technology must fit into his will in some way.

This raises the question: If technology fits into God’s plan, how does that actually work out? Tony Reinke in his book God, Technology, and the Christian Life points out two key biblical texts in Isaiah that help us wrestle with the question about the origin of technology and God’s relationship to it. A quick look at each of these texts will help us begin to drive at an answer to this important question.

The Farmer and His Tech: Isaiah 28:23-29

In Isaiah 28:23-29, Isaiah uses an illustration from the world of agriculture and farming as a parable about God’s judgment on Jerusalem. The main point is that though God is judging his people, the process is similar to how a farmer works his fields: his plowing and threshing isn’t forever, and it’s purpose is achieving the best crop possible.

Notice what God says about farmers and their techniques and technologies in verses 26 and 29:

The farmer knows just what to do, for God has given him understanding. . . . The LORD of Heaven’s Armies is a wonderful teacher, and he gives the farmer great wisdom. (Isaiah 28:26, 29, NLT)

The main point here within the metaphor Isaiah uses is that the farmer learns how to farm from God. The technology and methods he uses are taught to him by God. How? Through patterns in creation. The farmer discovers (through trial and error) how God has wired the world to work. He uses the patterns and elements of God’s creation to create techniques and technologies to produce better crops.

The farmer’s tech isn’t merely a human product outside of God’s plan. No, God teaches the farmer through how he has created the world. The Lord gives the farmer wisdom to make tech to further his goals. He is the Creator of this world, and he has wired it to work in a certain way with certain elements and within certain limits. The farmer makes tech to further his crop only according to the possibilities and patterns God has wired in his creation.

This applies to all forms of technology. All technology is simply discovering how the world works and using what God has already made to make something useful. Nobody makes anything out of nothing in a lab. They can only use what God has already made and shape it into something. Nothing is completely manmade. Everything goes back to God who made everything in creation.

This world was created by God, loaded with potential for technology. Technology is not an intruder on God’s creation; it arises from creation! Reinke writes,

“God taught us how to build rockets and planes like he taught the ancient farmer to grow crops. In every human discovery we find the Creator’s instruction. God is our tutor, and he ordains every link in the chain of technological revolution.” (102)

But what about technologies that are used for evil? Can we say that God teaches us how to build technologies that are used to destroy? That brings us to another text in Isaiah.

The Makers and Wielders of Weapons: Isaiah 54:16-17

In Isaiah 54, the Lord speaks of the future for his people, a future without fear, a future of peace and righteousness. Near the end of the chapter, the Lord declares that his people will not need to fear the makers and wielders of weapons who may rise against them:

“Behold, I have created the smith who blows the fire of coals and produces a weapon for its purpose. I have also created the ravager to destroy; no weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD and their vindication from me, declares the LORD.” (Isaiah 54:16-17)

The Lord is encouraging his people here: I’ve made both the blacksmith and the ravager, the one who fashions weapons and the one who wields weapons. They are under my control, God says, and they cannot hurt you apart from my will. The point is that God has power over those who make and use weapons, and, by extension, to all who make and use technology.

God has created both the makers of technology and those who use them. And this applies even to technologies that are used for evil, like weapons for unjust warfare. No technology is outside his control or his will. He created the makers and users. He is sovereign over them. No technology can thwart God’s purposes for his people.

As Reinke puts it in his book:

“In any discussion of technology, many Christians get hung up on the most powerful technologists in the world who are inventing the most threatening innovations on earth—nuclear power, killing weapons, space rockets, modified genetics—and assume that these men and women fall outside God’s governance. They don’t. Isaiah 54:16–17 shows us how God creates and governs the most powerful technologists.” (53)

Technology is no mere intruder. It not only stems from patterns and resources in God’s world, God also has a place for even the most destructive technologies in his perfect will. How that all works out is not ours to fully understand. But we know that God’s sovereignty over technology is ultimately for his glory and the good of his people. No innovation in tech will wipe out God’s people.

No technology is merely manmade or outside of God’s plan and purpose for history. Sure, some technologies can feel like “intruders” into our lives since they are subject to the curse of sin. Not all tech should be allowed a place in our lives! Often tech is not used for good. Yet, at the same time, no innovation is outside of God’s plan or will.

So, while we should have a healthy caution and intentionality about new (and some old) technologies, we can’t write them off as manmade products of human pride, as some inherently evil Babel enterprise. Even the Tower of Babel was within the sovereign will of God, and God used that situation to jumpstart the development of languages and cultures. No technology is simply neutral, yet all technologies, whether used for good or ill ultimately come from God and he is sovereign over them.

Technology may truly intrude into our lives at times. But technology is not alien to earth. All tech is earth-grown, derived from patterns in creation, and within the will of God. We must use it with wisdom for God’s glory and the good of those around us.

An Introduction to the Trinity

As Christians, we confess that God is the Trinity. We believe that the one God exists in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. But what does this really mean? Is this a biblical belief or something that a bunch of dudes made up at a church council? I’ll be honest, whenever I speak or teach about the Trinity I feel like there are pitfalls on every side. There are heresies, errors, and bad analogies everywhere. I recently picked up The Trinity: An Introduction by Scott Swain to help me as I continue to reflect on what it means that the One God exists as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. We can always use deeper thinking on the Trinity, and this book provides just that.

In The Trinity: An Introduction, Scott Swain seeks to set forth a biblical view of the Trinity and help us better understand the Bible’s basic “Trinitarian grammar.” Swain shows throughout the book that “Christians praise the triune God because that is how God presents himself to us in Holy Scripture: as one God in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,” (20). The theme of praise plays a major role throughout the book. Praise is our response to this doctrine and the goal of studying it. We don’t study the Trinity merely to be able to explain it, but stand in awe of who our Triune God is and embrace his revelation of himself in Scripture (63).

The Trinity is a biblical teaching. It is not something church leaders made up in the fourth century at a church council. The later creeds and confessions don’t improve what’s in the Bible. They are attempts to dig deeply into the Bible’s revelation of God as Triune (26-27). Swain highlights the baptismal formula in Matthew 28:19 as a prime example and summary of the Bible’s “Trinitarian grammar.” Christians are baptized in the one Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit: God is one, and the Father, Son, and Spirit are each identified fully with the one God.

The doctrine of Divine simplicity helps us maintain the unity of God as we confess the Trinity. God is not made up of parts. What he is he is (55). So, the divine persons cannot be parts of God or instances within the category of God (59-60). Yet, while God’s works are indivisible that doesn’t mean his life is incommunicable: “The simple God is the eternal life of communication and communion that is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the blessed Trinity,” (62).

Swain notes that “the Bible’s Trinitarian discourse consistently distinguishes the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit by their mutual relations, which are ‘relations of origin’” (32). In other words, the distinctions between the three persons of the Trinity are their relations to each other, not to us. These relations are the personal properties of paternity, filiation, and spiration: “the Father eternally begets the Son (paternity), the Son is eternally begotten of the Father (filiation), and the Father and the Son eternally breathe forth the Spirit (spiration),” (68).

Swain spends a chapter on each of these distinctions. He also addresses the three errors of modalism, subordinationism, and eternal relations of authority and submission (ERAS). God’s external works are inseparable, but there remains a general shape to these external works as “God’s external actions proceed from the Father, through the Son, in the Spirit,” (110). Thus, certain external works are appropriated to Father, Son, and Spirit, as they proceed “from the Father through the Son in the Spirit” (111).

The end-goal of the Triune God’s work in the world is himself. He is our supreme good (124). Through the means of grace (the preaching of the Word and the sacraments) the Father calls us to receive the Son by faith through the working of the Spirit in us. We were made to know, love, and praise the one God who is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Throughout the book, Swain captures historic Christian Trinitarian theology. The book is definitely a more technical and academic read than other books on the Trinity like Michael Reeves’ Delighting in the Trinity, but that is part of the purpose of the book. It belongs to a series of short studies in systematic theology, not a popular-level introduction to the Christian faith.

That being said, Swain emphasizes throughout the book that the reason we study the Trinity is not to dissect the doctrine somehow but to stand in awe before God as we see him revealed in Scripture. Even if a book like this takes more work to read, the work is for end of the praise and worship and love of our God and that is a worthy endeavor.

The book also devotes a whole chapter to divine simplicity, a doctrine that is neglected in many Christian circles and churches today. This neglect leads to problems. We can tend to view God as simply the balance of his attributes or think that one attribute in God somehow dominates another instead of viewing him as the God who is who he is and isn’t made up of parts. He isn’t the sum of his attributes or divided in any way. This is a key doctrine for understanding the unity of the Trinity and the unity in all that God does.

Swain also focuses on the mutual relations of the Father, Son, and Spirit as what distinguishes the persons of the Trinity. The distinctions between the persons are not primarily located in their relationship to us—the Father is not the Father because he is our Father, but because he is the eternal Father of the eternal Son. This distinction is crucial for orthodox (biblical) Trinitarian theology. Distinguishing the persons of the Trinity by their relationship to us quickly leads to errors like modalism (the persons are simply different expressions or modes in which God acts towards us).

Those who are looking to strengthen their understanding of the Trinity and grow in their worship of our Triune God will benefit from reading this book. It’s a short, but meaty book that demands a slow, careful reading. My understanding of the Trinity has been strengthened and, I pray, my worship of God deepened.